Comments on: Abusing your database without their knowledge http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2007/11/22/abusing-your-database-without-their-knowledge/ A Digital Evangelist's view of Marketing, Technology, Events and the Web. Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:38:51 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: kyeung http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2007/11/22/abusing-your-database-without-their-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-14 kyeung Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:37:58 +0000 http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2007/11/22/abusing-your-database-without-their-knowledge/#comment-14 Thank you Ryan...you are quite correct and I stand corrected. The article DOES say that the people are misrepresented as being AGAINST the merger. However, in my opinion, regardless of this situation, for a company to abuse an e-mail list of its subscribers, it would be a real dent on their credibility and violate the privacy of their customers. Thank you Ryan…you are quite correct and I stand corrected. The article DOES say that the people are misrepresented as being AGAINST the merger. However, in my opinion, regardless of this situation, for a company to abuse an e-mail list of its subscribers, it would be a real dent on their credibility and violate the privacy of their customers.

]]> By: Ryan http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2007/11/22/abusing-your-database-without-their-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Ryan Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:52:47 +0000 http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2007/11/22/abusing-your-database-without-their-knowledge/#comment-13 I just wanted to correct you on one thing - the people are being misrepresented as being AGAINST the XM-Sirius merger. Not for it. It's the merger opponents - namely the NAB - who set this up to make it seem like there's more people against the merger than there really are. Please read the Washington Post article again, it says something completely different than what you're stating. Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/21/AR2007112102149.html I just wanted to correct you on one thing – the people are being misrepresented as being AGAINST the XM-Sirius merger. Not for it.

It’s the merger opponents – namely the NAB – who set this up to make it seem like there’s more people against the merger than there really are.

Please read the Washington Post article again, it says something completely different than what you’re stating.

Link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/21/AR2007112102149.html

]]>