<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping An Eye Out For Those Tricky Twitter Spammers.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2009/09/28/keeping-an-eye-out-for-those-tricky-twitter-spammers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2009/09/28/keeping-an-eye-out-for-those-tricky-twitter-spammers/</link>
	<description>A Digital Evangelist&#039;s view of Marketing, Technology, Events and the Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:01:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Yeung</title>
		<link>http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2009/09/28/keeping-an-eye-out-for-those-tricky-twitter-spammers/comment-page-1/#comment-14179</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Yeung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thelettertwo.com/?p=1707#comment-14179</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s one of the main problems that can cause some headaches when Twitter decides to go forward with business-focused accounts. The elimination of twitter spammers is the responsibility of the manufacturer - that being Twitter, but the point here is that the focus for business and people who want to follow others back, there are some clear signs as to who you shouldn&#039;t follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s one of the main problems that can cause some headaches when Twitter decides to go forward with business-focused accounts. The elimination of twitter spammers is the responsibility of the manufacturer &#8211; that being Twitter, but the point here is that the focus for business and people who want to follow others back, there are some clear signs as to who you shouldn&#39;t follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blog.thelettertwo.com/2009/09/28/keeping-an-eye-out-for-those-tricky-twitter-spammers/comment-page-1/#comment-14178</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thelettertwo.com/?p=1707#comment-14178</guid>
		<description>You delineated some clear heuristics about how spam can be identified.  My question is: why do I have to manage this?  Why isn&#039;t Twitter trying to knock out spam more aggressively?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You delineated some clear heuristics about how spam can be identified.  My question is: why do I have to manage this?  Why isn&#39;t Twitter trying to knock out spam more aggressively?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
