Just who are spammers trying to kid on Twitter?

If you’ve become quite popular on Twitter or happen to have a rather large gathering of people, then you might know the recent trend of people spoofing your name. A perfect example is what happened to Forrester Research Senior Analyst Jeremiah Owyang. A very popular Twitterer, Jeremiah has amassed a following of over 30,000 people – not small by any measure. But with great success comes the people who look to jump onto your coattails and try and trick you into helping their bottom line.

Let’s look at Jeremiah’s example and analyze it. Over the span of a few hours, spammers created multiple variations of his Twitter screen name. So while he is known as @jowyang, there were many attempts to trick people with other creations like @jowAyang, @jowByang, etc. and if you viewed these spam profiles, it looked “almost” like his real profile. “Almost” you say? Yes, because aside from the profile picture and the description, there’s nothing else that matches up to say it’s Jeremiah’s profile. You can read his blog post to find out his reaction, but the point I’m trying to make is that these spammers have no sense but just to clutter up the Internet with their fake profiles.

The people on Twitter are pretty clever, so did the spammers think that people will see that “Jeremiah” is now following them a second time and then log into Twitter and follow the spammer profile? Sure, okay…so they managed to get the people to the profile page only to have them discover that this isn’t the typical Jeremiah that they know and follow. Wouldn’t the fact that the spoofed profile has only one update be a giveaway? I guess I’m having a rather difficult time trying to figure out what possible ROI they could get? Granted that’s probably a really bad thought because spammers don’t need to worry about ROI, but if no one is stupid enough to click on those links, then what’s the motivation for spammers to create those pseudo-profiles? It serves no purpose.

Thank you all for watching out for my brand, I appreciate each and every message.

That quote comes from Jeremiah himself and proves yet another point. If you have a strong following, then you won’t have to worry about intrusions on your brand because word will spread that an imposter has set up a spam account spoofing your profile. So yet another failed attempt by the spammers out there to cause havok and reap any rewards from their attempt.

So I ask then: just what are spammers trying to achieve in their repeated attempt to spoof people or create fake profiles? I highly doubt that if I click on the link in their sole update that it’s going to cease this senseless intrusion. Because it’ll lead to more headaches and idiotic “marketing” tactics. In the end, all it’s going to be is an inconvenience in the Twitterverse because we just have to spend 5 seconds to block them from ever contacting us again.

6 responses to “Just who are spammers trying to kid on Twitter?”

  1. mathew bridle Avatar

    you don't even need to be popular to get spammers. i've had them when i had only a couple of followers. mabybe one day they'll gow up and realise that news of them spreads as fast as their junk.

  2. Rachel Levy Avatar

    Good question, I have no idea what the benefit is either! Curious to see what others think.

  3. Jason Moffatt Avatar

    Sadly they've come up with automated bots that can add 1500 friends in minutes, and when the fake alias gets shut down, they just add another one ten seconds later.

    What would be helpful is getting the cooperation of the person who the spammer is directing the traffic to. It's almost always some internet marketing “make money” type product that these folks link to. With a bit of help from that vendor they could pinpoint the spammers.

    Of course this would mean the vendor would be losing that traffic and potential commissions from the spammer.

    But I have a feeling there are a few good guys left that would rat out the spammers.

  4. Dale Dietrich Avatar

    Over the last couple weeks I've received a surge of new followers that all fit the same paradigm – they have almost identical followers to people they are following ratio. For example they'll be people following 15,287 others and 15, 303 are following them. In my experience most twitterers follow more people than follow them.

    My first instinct is why would someone with 15,000 plus followers follow someone like me? But then this happened again and again over the space of the last couple weeks. I've started to think that there are twitterers creating accounts en-masse and having each account follow the other – which accounts for why the follower/to followee ratio stays largely constant. My thinking is that this way they can quickly gin up massive amounts of followers because they are following massive numbers of others.

    Suffice it to say, every time someone with a massive number of followers begins to follow me, if the number of people they follow is almost identical, I block them. This can't be anything other than a new spam technique.

    …Dale

  5. kyeung808 Avatar

    @matthew – You're absolutely right. You don't need to be popular. But in the situation that I described above, when I've encountered it, it seemed that the real user had a following of over 1,000. But when dealing with social media, it goes both ways & people will warn everyone else before most of the spam is sent out.

    @Rachel – Perhaps the spammers get the most benefit by the amount of spoof accounts they can set up, regardless of the amount of conversion. It's a ridiculous trade.

    @Jason – You're right, but if I think that the website these profiles are pointing to are all set up by the spammers as well. It might be hard to simply say “Hi, I'm looking for a spammer that will mass attract people to my site”. I can't imagine a self-respecting businessperson doing that. Horrible reputation.

    @Dale – You know, I've noticed that to. I *think* that their profile is legit and then I see their follower-following ratio…if it's grossly disproportional, then you know something's up. Although it helps if they don't have a profile or even more than one update.

    Thank you all for your comments. I'm really digging your insights! Keep 'em coming!

  6. Ken Yeung Avatar

    @matthew – You're absolutely right. You don't need to be popular. But in the situation that I described above, when I've encountered it, it seemed that the real user had a following of over 1,000. But when dealing with social media, it goes both ways & people will warn everyone else before most of the spam is sent out.

    @Rachel – Perhaps the spammers get the most benefit by the amount of spoof accounts they can set up, regardless of the amount of conversion. It's a ridiculous trade.

    @Jason – You're right, but if I think that the website these profiles are pointing to are all set up by the spammers as well. It might be hard to simply say “Hi, I'm looking for a spammer that will mass attract people to my site”. I can't imagine a self-respecting businessperson doing that. Horrible reputation.

    @Dale – You know, I've noticed that to. I *think* that their profile is legit and then I see their follower-following ratio…if it's grossly disproportional, then you know something's up. Although it helps if they don't have a profile or even more than one update.

    Thank you all for your comments. I'm really digging your insights! Keep 'em coming!

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Ken Yeung

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading